{"id":967,"date":"2012-09-30T00:00:19","date_gmt":"2012-09-29T23:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.turski.me\/?p=967"},"modified":"2012-09-30T00:00:19","modified_gmt":"2012-09-29T23:00:40","slug":"26th-sunday-in-ordinary-time-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/?p=967","title":{"rendered":"26th Sunday in Ordinary time"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">She has always taken her faith seriously. As a teenager and then a university student she was involved in parish youth groups. Once she met a wonderful man and they fell in love. He had no religious background whatsoever, but she strongly hoped to lead him to faith in God. With that hope she decided to move in with him. But soon she got frustrated as he\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0show any interest in her religion. Saddened and broken she took part in a weekend retreat for students. On Sunday morning she was late and I assumed it was a \u2018standard student oversleep\u2019. But in fact she had talked to her boyfriend as she had radically decided to leave him and end their sinful relationship. It must have been extremely difficult for her. A few days later that devastated man asked me a lot of questions in his email. I\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0manage to reply &#8211; my computer had crashed and I\u2019d lost his address. One year later he sent me another email, this time full of joy and happiness. It turned out he\u2019d been pondering on his girlfriend\u2019s decision and decided to find out more about God that made her leave him. He\u2019d found his way and was being prepared for baptism. Her radical decision subsequently brought the result she\u00a0couldn&#8217;t\u00a0get in giving him her body.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">Jesus in today\u2019s gospel seems to be radical to an unacceptable extent: <em>\u2018if your hand should cause you to sin, cut it off; if your foot should cause you to sin, cut it off; if your eye should cause you to sin, tear it out.\u2019<\/em> In the history of the Church there have been people who followed this piece of advice quite literally, introducing all those mortifying practices that from our perspective look rather creepy. Another sort of radicalism we might have observed recently in reports about Muslim protests, including a Pakistani government minister pledging a bounty to anyone killing the author of the infamous film. This sort of radicalism is appalling and repulsive, and with the exception of a few fundamental groups, rather alien to modern Christianity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">In fact, in our politically correct western culture and society radicalism of any sort is unwelcome and perceived as suspicious and dangerous. Seemingly all sharp divisions in our society have been eased and consequently disappeared. However we are witnesses to some radical changes happening now. The absence of rough, divisive language\u00a0doesn&#8217;t\u00a0mean the absence of radical ideas in the current social, cultural and political climate. Their heralds have learnt that smooth, peaceful and non-aggressive approach can win for them much greater support than a noisy and confrontational one.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">Should we, as Christians, be radical? If so, what sort of radicalism should we accept? The one associated with violent Muslim-style protests, or the smooth one adopted by the heralds of the Brave New World? None of them; although seemingly they are on the opposite ends of the scale, they are very similar \u2013 they are directed outward and want to set the lives of other people, regardless of their willingness. Today\u2019s gospel is very clear on this matter. Let\u2019s look carefully at it again.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">Firstly, the Apostles see someone behaving differently to them, and they request Jesus to forbid him doing so. But Jesus\u2019 response is simple: <em>\u2018You must not stop him. Anyone who is not against us is for us.\u2019<\/em> And then Jesus speaks about radicalism directed inwards: <em>\u2018If <strong>your<\/strong> hand, <strong>your<\/strong> foot or <strong>your<\/strong> eye should cause you to sin, remove it.\u2019 <\/em>This is the only kind of radicalism acceptable to Christians, and the only one not repulsive to non-Christians. You must be radical concerning yourself \u2013 and understanding to others.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>She has always taken her faith seriously. As a teenager and then a university student she was involved in parish youth groups. Once she met a wonderful man and they fell in love. He had no religious background whatsoever, but she strongly hoped to lead him to faith in God. With that hope she decided to move in with him. But soon she got frustrated as he\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0show any interest in her religion. Saddened and broken she took part in a weekend retreat for students. On Sunday morning she was late and I assumed it was a \u2018standard student oversleep\u2019. But in fact she had talked to her boyfriend as she had radically decided to leave him and end their sinful relationship. It must have been extremely difficult for her. A few days later that devastated man asked me a lot of questions in his email. I\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0manage to reply &#8211; my computer had crashed and I\u2019d lost his address. One year later he sent me another email, this time full of joy and happiness. It turned out he\u2019d been pondering on his girlfriend\u2019s decision and decided to find out more about God that made her leave him. He\u2019d found his way and was being prepared for baptism. Her radical decision subsequently brought the result she\u00a0couldn&#8217;t\u00a0get in giving him her body. Jesus in today\u2019s gospel seems to be radical to an unacceptable extent: \u2018if your hand should cause you to sin, cut it off; if your foot should cause you to sin, cut it off; if your eye should cause you to sin, tear it out.\u2019 In the history of the Church there have been people who followed this piece of advice quite literally, introducing all those mortifying practices that from our perspective look rather creepy. Another sort of radicalism we might have observed recently in reports about Muslim protests, including a Pakistani government minister pledging a bounty to anyone killing the author of the infamous film. This sort of radicalism is appalling and repulsive, and with the exception of a few fundamental groups, rather alien to modern Christianity. In fact, in our politically correct western culture and society radicalism of any sort is unwelcome and perceived as suspicious and dangerous. Seemingly all sharp divisions in our society have been eased and consequently disappeared. However we are witnesses to some radical changes happening now. The absence of rough, divisive language\u00a0doesn&#8217;t\u00a0mean the absence of radical ideas in the current social, cultural and political climate. Their heralds have learnt that smooth, peaceful and non-aggressive approach can win for them much greater support than a noisy and confrontational one. Should we, as Christians, be radical? If so, what sort of radicalism should we accept? The one associated with violent Muslim-style protests, or the smooth one adopted by the heralds of the Brave New World? None of them; although seemingly they are on the opposite ends of the scale, they are very similar \u2013 they are directed outward and want to set the lives of other people, regardless of their willingness. Today\u2019s gospel is very clear on this matter. Let\u2019s look carefully at it again. Firstly, the Apostles see someone behaving differently to them, and they request Jesus to forbid him doing so. But Jesus\u2019 response is simple: \u2018You must not stop him. Anyone who is not against us is for us.\u2019 And then Jesus speaks about radicalism directed inwards: \u2018If your hand, your foot or your eye should cause you to sin, remove it.\u2019 This is the only kind of radicalism acceptable to Christians, and the only one not repulsive to non-Christians. You must be radical concerning yourself \u2013 and understanding to others.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sermon","category-year-b"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/967\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tad.scot\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}